Virtual Interviews in Neurosurgery Resident Selection-A Work in Progress

INTRODUCTION: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the ACGME recommended all interviews for the 2021 residency application cycle be held virtually. Because this is major shift from neurosurgical interviews in past years, this study aims to evaluate both applicant and interviewer satisfac-tion of conducting interviews virtually. METHODS: For faculty, an 11-question online survey was sent to 116 United States neurosurgery training programs. A 14-question online survey was sent to 255 neurosurgery applicants. The resulting data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. RESULTS: From applicants, 118 responses were received. From faculty, 171 individual responses were received. Thirty-five percent (34.7%) of applicants agreed that they were satisfied with the virtual interview process as a whole. Although 44.5% of faculty disagreed with the statement I would like to replace in-person interviews with virtual interviews in the future, 57.3% of faculty agreed that they were likely to implement virtual in-terviews in the future. -CONCLUSIONS: Some things might be better assessed through in-person interviews, but there are clear benefits to virtual interviews. Future iterations of the interview process, incorporating virtual interviews, might help determine how and in which situations virtual interviews can be utilized in future residency application cycles.

Automated summary

While 34.7% of applicants are satisfied with virtual interviews, 44.5% of faculty do not want to replace in-person interviews with virtual interviews in the future. However, 57.3% of faculty are likely to implement virtual interviews in the future.