4.6 Article

Quantifying VR cybersickness using EEG

Journal

VIRTUAL REALITY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 77-89

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-021-00517-2

Keywords

Experimental methods; HMD; Visualization; Psychology; User-study; Perception

Funding

  1. NSF [18-23321, 15-64212, 14-29404]
  2. State of Maryland's MPower initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By studying EEG signals in immersive virtual environments, a correlation between cybersickness and an increase in Delta, Theta, and Alpha waves has been found. Establishing a strong correlation between cybersickness and EEG-measured brain activity is the first step towards interactively characterizing and mitigating cybersickness in virtual environments.
Current techniques for characterizing cybersickness (visually induced motion sickness) in virtual environments rely on qualitative questionnaires. For interactive graphics to create visual experiences that enhance the illusion of presence while mitigating cybersickness, interactive measures are needed to characterize cybersickness. In this paper, we acquire EEG signals from participants as they experience vection-induced cybersickness and compare those signals to a baseline. Our study shows that there is a correlation between the participant-reported cybersickness (as measured by movements of a joystick) and brain EEG signals. Through independent component analysis, we separate those signals which are a result of cybersickness from other sources (such as eye blinks). Our user study finds that there is a highly correlative and statistically significant Delta- (1.0-4.0 Hz), Theta- (4.0-7.0 Hz), and Alpha-wave (7.0-13.0 Hz) increase associated with cybersickness in immersive virtual environments across participants. Establishing a strong correlation between cybersickness and EEG-measured brain activity provides us with the first step toward interactively characterizing and mitigating cybersickness in virtual environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available