4.6 Article

An authoring tool for democratizing the creation of high-quality VR experiences

Journal

VIRTUAL REALITY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 105-124

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-021-00541-2

Keywords

VR authoring tools; Transpiling; Culture

Funding

  1. European Union [825585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on three aspects: identifying advantages and disadvantages of current methods for non-programmers to create VR experiences, analyzing responses from testers on usability, and proposing a new methodology to improve graphics quality. The proposed authoring tool uses a WordPress plugin to provide a 3D editor and achieves a one-to-one matching between three.js, WordPress, and Unity3D entities for transpiling. Evaluation results show positive adoption from non-programmers but suggest room for improvement.
The contribution of this paper is toward three directions, namely (a) in identifying the advantages and disadvantages of the current state-of-the-art methods that allow laymen in programming to author VR experiences; (b) in examining how easily non-experts in programming can author VR experiences by analysing the responses from several testers toward easiness and usability when using the proposed authoring tool; and (c) in treating a serious disadvantage of state-of-the-art methods, namely the low quality in graphics by proposing a novel methodology for transpiling web-based formats such as three.js into high performance runtime formats like Unity3D. The proposed authoring tool is a plugin for WordPress that exploits its interfaces and database for providing a 3D editor suitable for authoring VR experiences. It embeds the proposed methodology which achieves an one-to-one matching between three.js, WordPress and Unity3D entities to achieve transpiling. Evaluation results indicate the positive adoption of non-experts in programming, but there is still several improvements to be made.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available