4.7 Review

Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy and exosomes in COVID-19: current trends and prospects

Journal

STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02542-z

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cell; Mesenchymal stromal cell; Exosomes; COVID-19; Immunomodulation; Cytokine storm; SARS-CoV-2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MSCs have therapeutic potential in treating COVID-19 by their immunomodulatory and regenerative activities. Clinical studies have shown positive effects of MSCs on the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and cytokine storm. Research also involves the sources, doses, administration, and optimization strategies for MSC-based therapies.
Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. The virus causes an exaggerated immune response, resulting in a cytokine storm and acute respiratory distress syndrome, the leading cause of COVID-19-related mortality and morbidity. So far, no therapies have succeeded in circumventing the exacerbated immune response or cytokine storm associated with COVID-19. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), through their immunomodulatory and regenerative activities, mostly mediated by their paracrine effect and extracellular vesicle production, have therapeutic potential in many autoimmune, inflammatory, and degenerative diseases. In this paper, we review clinical studies on the use of MSCs for COVID-19 treatment, including the salutary effects of MSCs on the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and the immunomodulation of the cytokine storm. Ongoing clinical trial designs, cell sources, dose and administration, and populations are summarized, and the paracrine mode of benefit is discussed. We also offer suggestions for optimizing MSC-based therapies, including genetic engineering, strategies for cell surface modification, nanotechnology applications, and combination therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available