4.4 Article

Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 65, Issue 634, Pages E305-E311

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X684829

Keywords

cancer; continuity of care; diagnosis; general practice; patient-doctor continuity; symptoms

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C41384/A13266]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [CTF-01-12-06] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2008-25-004, CTF-01-12-06] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Continuity of care may affect the diagnostic process in cancer but there is little research. Aim To estimate associations between patient-doctor continuity and time to diagnosis and referral of three common cancers. Design and setting Retrospective cohort study in general practices in England. Method This study used data from the General Practice Research Database for patients aged >= 40 years with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Relevant cancer symptoms or signs were identified up to 12 months before diagnosis. Patient-doctor continuity (fraction-of-care index adjusted for number of consultations) was calculated up to 24 months before diagnosis. Time ratios (TRs) were estimated using accelerated failure time regression models. Results Patient-doctor continuity in the 24 months before diagnosis was associated with a slightly later diagnosis of colorectal (time ratio [TR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to1.02) but not breast (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.01) or lung cancer (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.00). Secondary analyses suggested that for colorectal and lung cancer, continuity of doctor before the index consultation was associated with a later diagnosis but continuity after the index consultation was associated with an earlier diagnosis, with no such effects for breast cancer. For all three cancers, most of the delay to diagnosis occurred after referral. Conclusion Any effect for patient-doctor continuity appears to be small. Future studies should compare investigations, referrals, and diagnoses in patients with and without cancer who present with possible cancer symptoms or signs; and focus on 'difficult to diagnose' types of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available