4.7 Article

Identification and molecular characterization of cellular factors required for glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mRNA decay

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 30, Issue 18, Pages 2093-2105

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.286484.116

Keywords

glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mRNA decay; YBX1; HRSP12; UPF1; PNRC2

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea grant - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning) [NRF-2014R1A2A1A11050412, NRF-2015R1A3A2033665]
  2. Korea University grant
  3. Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucocorticoid (GC) receptor (GR) has been shown recently to bind a subset of mRNAs and elicit rapid mRNA degradation. However, the molecular details of GR-mediated mRNA decay (GMD) remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that GMD triggers rapid degradation of target mRNAs in a translation-independent and exon junction complex independent manner, confirming that GMD is mechanistically distinct from nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). Efficient GMD requires PNRC2 (proline-rich nuclear receptor coregulatory protein 2) binding, helicase ability, and ATM-mediated phosphorylation of UPF1 (upstream frameshift 1). We also identify two GMD-specific factors: an RNA-binding protein, YBX1 (Y-box-binding protein 1), and an endoribonuclease, HRSP12 (heat-responsive protein 12). In particular, using HRSP12 variants, which are known to disrupt trimerization of HRSP12, we show that HRSP12 plays an essential role in the formation of a functionally active GMD complex. Moreover, we determine the hierarchical recruitment of GMD factors to target mRNAs. Finally, our genome-wide analysis shows that GMD targets a variety of transcripts, implicating roles in a wide range of cellular processes, including immune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available