4.7 Article

Accuracy of citrulline, I-FABP and d-lactate in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98012-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. APHP
  2. MSD-Avenir
  3. Fondation de l'Avenir
  4. French Gastroenterology Society (SNFGE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of three promising circulating biomarkers for diagnosing AMI, including citrulline, I-FABP, and d-lactate. The results showed that citrulline concentration was significantly lower in AMI patients compared to controls, but it had low accuracy in diagnosing AMI. I-FABP and d-lactate did not show statistical differences between AMI patients and controls, indicating a need for further research to identify new biomarkers.
Early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) remains a clinical challenge, and no biomarker has been consistently validated. We aimed to assess the accuracy of three promising circulating biomarkers for diagnosing AMI-citrulline, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), and d-lactate. A cross-sectional diagnostic study enrolled AMI patients admitted to the intestinal stroke center and controls with acute abdominal pain of another origin. We included 129 patients-50 AMI and 79 controls. Plasma citrulline concentrations were significantly lower in AMI patients compared to the controls [15.3 mu mol/L (12.0-26.0) vs. 23.3 mu mol/L (18.3-29.8), p = 0.001]. However, the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC) for the diagnosis of AMI by Citrulline was low: 0.68 (95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.78). No statistical difference was found in plasma I-FABP and plasma d-lactate concentrations between the AMI and control groups, with an AUROC of 0.44, and 0.40, respectively. In this large cross-sectional study, citrulline, I-FABP, and d-lactate failed to differentiate patients with AMI from patients with acute abdominal pain of another origin. Further research should focus on the discovery of new biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available