4.7 Article

Optimization of polycaprolactone-based nanofiber matrices for the cultivation of corneal endothelial cells

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98426-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [PA738/15-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares four types of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for corneal endothelial cell transplantation, finding that blends with collagen and gelatin have higher cell viability, making them suitable for use as artificial posterior lamellar grafts.
Posterior lamellar transplantation of the eye' s cornea (DSAEK, DMEK) currently is the gold standard for treating patients with corneal endothelial cell and back surface pathologies resulting in functional impairment. An artificial biomimetic graft carrying human corneal endothelium could minimize the dependency on human donor corneas giving access to this vision-restoring surgery to large numbers of patients, thus reducing current long waiting lists. In this study, four groups of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds were compared: polycaprolactone (PCL), PCL/collagen, PCL/gelatin and PCL/chitosan. Each of the scaffolds were tissue-engineered with human corneal endothelial cells (HCEC-B4G12) and analyzed with regard to their potential application as artificial posterior lamellar grafts. Staining with ZO-1 and Na+/K+-ATPase antibodies revealed intact cell functionalities. It could be shown, that blending leads to decreasing contact angle, whereby a heterogeneous blend morphology could be revealed. Scaffold cytocompatibility could be confirmed for all groups via live/dead staining, whereby a significant higher cell viability could be observed for the collagen and gelatine blended matrices with 97 +/- 3% and 98 +/- 2% living cells respectively. TEM images show the superficial anchoring of the HCECs onto the scaffolds. This work emphasizes the benefit of blended PCL nanofibrous scaffolds for corneal endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available