4.7 Article

Influence of the 5′-terminal sequences on the 5′-UTR structure of HIV-1 genomic RNA

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90427-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation [19:4-21]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (Research Program on HIV/AIDS) [21fk0410041h0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 5' -UTR of HIV-1 genomic RNA plays a crucial role in virus function, with different 5' -terminal sequences and structural characteristics affecting translation and reverse transcription reactions. The joint region between the TAR and PolyA stems has been shown to have small differences in the 5' -terminus, impacting the conformational characteristics of stem-loop structures. These findings highlight the importance of local conformation in the function of the 5' -UTR.
The 5 ' -UTR of HIV-1 genomic RNA is known to form specific structures and has important functions. There are three 5 ' -terminal sequences, G1, G2 and G3, with different localizations in the cell and virion particles as well as different efficiencies in translation and reverse transcription reactions. In the present study, the structural characteristics of the joint region between the TAR and PolyA stems was analysed, and it was found that small differences in the 5 ' -terminus affect the conformational characteristics of the stem-loop structures. In the G1 form, the two stems form a coaxial stem, whereas in the G2 and G3 forms, the two stems are structurally independent of each other. In the case of the G1 form, the 3 ' -flanking nucleotides of the PolyA stem are included in the stable coaxial stem structure, which may affect the rest of the 5 ' -UTR structure. This result demonstrates that the local conformation of this functionally key region has an important role in the function of the 5 ' -UTR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available