4.7 Article

Dissociated prismatic loop punching by bubble growth in FCC metals

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92219-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Nuclear Science User Facilities [DE-AC07-05ID14517]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy & Science (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under FWP at Idaho National Laboratory [DE-AC07-05ID14517, C000-14-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study elaborates on the bubble growth process in Cu through atomistic modeling, showing that bubble generation can significantly degrade material performance. The formation and development of bubbles involve multiple steps, potentially leading to the formation of a self-organized bubble superlattice.
Materials performance can be significantly degraded due to bubble generation. In this work, the bubble growth process is elaborated in Cu by atomistic modeling to bridge the gap of experimental observations. Upon continuous He implantation, bubble growth is accommodated first by nucleation of dislocation network from bubble surface, then formation of dissociated prismatic dislocation loop (DPDL), and final DPDL emission in 110 directions. As the DPDL is found capable of collecting He atoms, this process is likely to assist the formation of self-organized bubble superlattice, which has been reported from experiments. Moreover, the pressurized bubble in solid state manifests the shape of an imperfect octahedron, built by Cu {111} surfaces, consistent with experiments. These atomistic details integrating experimental work fill the gap of mechanistic understanding of athermal bubble growth in Cu. Importantly, by associating with nanoindentation testings, DPDL punching by bubble growth arguably applies to various FCC (face-centered cubic) metals such as Au, Ag, Ni, and Al.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available