A top-down measure of gene-to-gene coordination for analyzing cell-to-cell variability

Recent technological advances, such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), allow the measurement of gene expression profiles of individual cells. These expression profiles typically exhibit substantial variations even across seemingly homogeneous populations of cells. Two main different sources contribute to this measured variability: actual differences between the biological activity of the cells and technical measurement errors. Analysis of the biological variability may provide information about the underlying gene regulation of the cells, yet distinguishing it from the technical variability is a challenge. Here, we apply a recently developed computational method for measuring the global gene coordination level (GCL) to systematically study the cell-to-cell variability in numerical models of gene regulation. We simulate 'biological variability' by introducing heterogeneity in the underlying regulatory dynamic of different cells, while 'technical variability' is represented by stochastic measurement noise. We show that the GCL decreases for cohorts of cells with increased 'biological variability' only when it is originated from the interactions between the genes. Moreover, we find that the GCL can evaluate and compare-for cohorts with the same cell-to-cell variability-the ratio between the introduced biological and technical variability. Finally, we show that the GCL is robust against spurious correlations that originate from a small sample size or from the compositionality of the data. The presented methodology can be useful for future analysis of high-dimensional ecological and biochemical dynamics.

Automated summary

Recent technological advances, such as single-cell RNA sequencing, have enabled the measurement of gene expression profiles at the single-cell level. These profiles show significant variability, which can be attributed to differences in biological activity and technical measurement errors. Analyzing biological variability can provide insights into gene regulation, but distinguishing it from technical variability is a challenge.