4.7 Article

Underwater noise mitigation in the Santa Barbara Channel through incentive-based vessel speed reduction

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96506-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dr. Nancy Foster Scholarship
  2. Wyer Family Fund
  3. Archie Arnold Foundation
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting program (NASA) [NNX14AR62A]
  5. Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management Ecosystem Studies program (BOEM) [MC15AC00006]
  6. NOAA
  7. Office of Naval Research
  8. Task Force Ocean
  9. Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Commercial shipping is the main source of low-frequency noise in the ocean, and reducing vessel speed has been shown to significantly decrease noise emissions from ships. Ships participating in speed reduction programs between 2014 and 2017 had lower noise levels compared to non-participating ships.
Commercial shipping is the dominant source of low-frequency noise in the ocean. It has been shown that the noise radiated by an individual vessel depends upon the vessel's speed. This study quantified the reduction in source levels (SLs) and sound exposure levels (SELs) for ships participating in two variations of a vessel speed reduction (VSR) program. SLs and SELs of individual ships participating in the program between 2014 and 2017 were statistically lower than non-participating ships (p < 0.001). In the 2018 fleet-based program, there were statistical differences between the SLs and SELs of fleets that participated with varying degrees of cooperation. Significant reductions in SL and SEL relied on cooperation of 25% or more in slowing vessel speed. This analysis highlights how slowing vessel speed to 10 knots or less is an effective method in reducing underwater noise emitted from commercial ships.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available