4.7 Article

Unveiling the nature of interaction between semantics and phonology in lexical access based on multilayer networks

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93925-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation
  2. ONR
  3. Israel Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)
  4. Italy Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  5. NSF-BSF [2019740]
  6. MOST
  7. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  8. BIU Center for Research in Applied Cryptography and Cyber Security
  9. DTRA [HDTRA-1-19-1-0016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study finds that phonological and semantic layers are highly similar, and adding information between layers increases efficiency. A multilayer architecture demonstrates the highest efficiency, which is related to weak semantic relations between cue words in the network.
An essential aspect of human communication is the ability to access and retrieve information from ones' 'mental lexicon'. This lexical access activates phonological and semantic components of concepts, yet the question whether and how these two components relate to each other remains widely debated. We harness tools from network science to construct a large-scale linguistic multilayer network comprising of phonological and semantic layers. We find that the links in the two layers are highly similar to each other and that adding information from one layer to the other increases efficiency by decreasing the network overall distances, but specifically affecting shorter distances. Finally, we show how a multilayer architecture demonstrates the highest efficiency, and how this efficiency relates to weak semantic relations between cue words in the network. Thus, investigating the interaction between the layers and the unique benefit of a linguistic multilayer architecture allows us to quantify theoretical cognitive models of lexical access.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available