4.7 Article

Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Hepatic Glycogen Storage Diseases

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13092987

Keywords

glycogen storage disease; bone mineral density; GSD; bone; osteocalcin; photon absorptiometry

Funding

  1. CNPq
  2. FAPERGS
  3. FIPE-HCPA
  4. Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The association between bone mineral density (BMD) and hepatic glycogen storage diseases (GSDs) is still unclear. This study found that patients with hepatic GSDs may have low BMD, especially in the presence of muscular involvement and poor metabolic control. Systematic nutritional monitoring of these patients is essential.
The association between bone mineral density (BMD) and hepatic glycogen storage diseases (GSDs) is still unclear. To evaluate the BMD of patients with GSD I, IIIa and IX alpha, a cross-sectional study was performed, including 23 patients (GSD Ia = 13, Ib = 5, IIIa = 2 and IX alpha = 3; median age = 11.9 years; IQ = 10.9-20.1) who underwent a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteocalcin (OC, n = 18), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP, n = 19), collagen type 1 C-terminal telopeptide (CTX, n = 18) and 25-OH Vitamin D (n = 23) were also measured. The participants completed a 3-day food diary (n = 20). Low BMD was defined as a Z-score <= -2.0. All participants were receiving uncooked cornstarch (median dosage = 6.3 g/kg/day) at inclusion, and 11 (47.8%) presented good metabolic control. Three (13%) patients (GSD Ia = 1, with poor metabolic control; IIIa = 2, both with high CPK levels) had a BMD <= -2.0. CTX, OC and P1NP correlated negatively with body weight and age. 25-OH Vitamin D concentration was decreased in seven (30.4%) patients. Our data suggest that patients with hepatic GSDs may have low BMD, especially in the presence of muscular involvement and poor metabolic control. Systematic nutritional monitoring of these patients is essential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available