4.6 Article

Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement by a Novel In-House Model-Free and Zero-Setup Fully Guided Surgical Template Made of a Light-Cured Composite Resin (VARO Guide(R)): A Comparative In Vitro Study

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14144023

Keywords

digital dentistry; virtual surgical planning; guided implant surgery; intraoral scan; cone beam computed tomography

Funding

  1. Korea Medical Device Development Fund - Government of South Korea (Ministry of Science and ICT) [KMDF_PR_20200901_0257]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Government of South Korea (MSIT) [NRF-2019R1C1C1006622]
  3. Korea Medical Device Development Fund - Government of South Korea (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy) [KMDF_PR_20200901_0257]
  4. Korea Medical Device Development Fund - Government of South Korea (Ministry of Health and Welfare) [KMDF_PR_20200901_0257]
  5. Korea Medical Device Development Fund - Government of South Korea (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) [KMDF_PR_20200901_0257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that regardless of experience, both VG and NG surgeries showed reliable positional accuracy; however, the total procedure time and preparation time were much shorter in the VG surgery compared to the NG surgery.
Background: This in vitro study mainly aimed to compare VARO Guide(R) to the surgical guide fabricated by CAD/CAM (NAVI Guide(R)) in terms of accuracy and efficacy of the implant surgery held in the dentiform model. Methods: Twenty surgeons, 10 dentists in the beginner group and 10 dentists in the expert group, participated in the study. Each surgeon conducted fully guided surgery in dentiform models twice, once with VARO Guide(R) (VG surgery) and the other time with a conventional type of templates, NAVI Guide(R) (NG surgery). Based on the superimposition of presurgical and postsurgical STL files, the positional deviations between the virtually planned and actually placed implants and the time spent on presurgical preparation and surgical procedures were estimated and compared. Results: All dimensional deviations were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the expert and beginner groups regardless of the guide system. The total procedure time (mean (median)) of the VG surgery (26.33 (28.58) min) was significantly shorter than that of the NG surgery (378.83 (379.35) min; p < 0.05). While the time spent only for the fully guided implant surgery (from the start of the surgical guide sitting onto the dentiform model to the final installation of the implant fixture) was comparable (p > 0.05), the presurgical preparation time spent on virtual implant planning and surgical guide fabrication in the VG surgery (19.63 (20.93) min) was significantly shorter compared to the NG surgery (372.93 (372.95) min; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Regardless of experience, both VG and NG surgery showed reliable positional accuracy; however, the total procedure time and the preparation time were much shorter in the VG surgery compared to the NG surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available