4.6 Article

Improvement Prediction on the Dynamic Performance of Epoxy Composite Used in Packaging by Using Nano-Particle Reinforcements in Addition to 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Toughener

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14154193

Keywords

electronic packaging; dynamic storage modulus; loss tangent; optimization

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By investigating the use of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) toughening agent and various nano-powders, this study optimized the dynamic properties of epoxy composites. Through experimentation and analysis, the optimal composition ratios and performance enhancement effects were determined.
Epoxy with low viscosity and good fluidity before curing has been widely applied in the packaging of electronic and electrical devices. Nevertheless, its low flexibility and toughness renders the requirement of property improvement before it can be widely acceptable in dynamic loading applications. This study investigates the possible use of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) toughening agent and nano-powders, such as alumina, silicon dioxide, and carbon black, to form epoxy composites for dynamic property improvement. Considering the different combinations of the nano-powders and HEMA toughener, the Taguchi method with an L9 orthogonal array was adopted for composition optimization. The dynamic storage modulus and loss tangent of the prepared specimen were measured by employing a dynamic mechanical analyzer. With polynomial regression, the curve-fitted relationships of the glass transition temperature and storage modulus with respect to the design factors were obtained. It was found that although the raise in the weight fraction of nano-powders was beneficial in increasing the rigidity of the epoxy composite, an optimal amount of HEMA toughener existed for its best damping improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available