4.6 Article

Study of the Electrooxidation of a Zinc Concentrate

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14112868

Keywords

electroleaching; zinc sulfides; sphalerite; pyrite

Funding

  1. Tecnologico de Monterrey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the recovery of zinc from low-iron sphalerite mineral in a sulfate medium, with a particular emphasis on the anodic dissolution mechanism of the EBHSS mineral. Experimental results revealed a low electrodissolution rate of EBHSS, but experiments with doped EBHSS showed an increased rate of electrodissolution, leading to higher zinc recovery.
Zinc has wide industrial applications; consequently, its extraction procedures have been extensively studied. Hydrometallurgy is one of the most common methods employed for zinc recovery. However, the electrooxidation of sphalerite and the effect of the pyrite content in the concentrate have not been investigated; thus, in this work, zinc recovery from low-iron sphalerite mineral with a relatively high pyrite content (EBHSS), in a sulfate medium was further explored. The reaction mechanism of the anodic dissolution of the EBHSS mineral was established by microelectrolysis using mineral carbon paste electrodes; these results were used to determine adequate conditions for the macroelectrolysis of the sample. The macroelectrolysis indicated that EBHSS has a low electrodissolution rate; additionally, different analyses of the species produced in the macroelectrolysis showed that the ohmic drop registered in the collector had no influence in the passivation of the EBHSS surface. It was also determined that the dissolution of EBHSS was driven by the charge transfer of the sphalerite particles, which are not very efficient for electronic conductivity. Experiments using doped EBHSS led to an increase of the electrodissolution rate, which consequently increased the recovered zinc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available