4.6 Article

Design of Circular Composite Cylinders for Optimal Natural Frequencies

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14123203

Keywords

composite cylinders; stiffness tailoring; lamination parameters; free vibration modes; eigenfrequency separation; optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study optimizes the eigenfrequencies of circular cylindrical laminates using lamination parameters to avoid solution dependency on initial assumptions. Results show that the maximum fundamental frequency points of laminated cylinders mostly lie at the inner lamination parameter domain, unlike singly curved composite panels. The second eigenfrequency shows a nonconvex response surface containing multiple local maxima for several cases, while frequency difference contours appear highly irregular.
This study concerns optimizing the eigenfrequencies of circular cylindrical laminates. The stiffness properties are described by lamination parameters to avoid potential solution dependency on the initial assumptions of the laminate configurations. In the lamination parameter plane, novel response contours are obtained for the first and second natural frequencies as well as their difference. The influence of cylinder length, radius, thickness, and boundary conditions on the responses is investigated. The lamination parameters yielding the maximum response values are determined, and the first two mode shapes are shown for the optimum points. The results demonstrate that the maximum fundamental frequency points of the laminated cylinders mostly lie at the inner lamination parameter domain, unlike the singly curved composite panels. In addition, the second eigenfrequency shows a nonconvex response surface containing multiple local maxima for several cases. Moreover, the frequency difference contours appear as highly irregular, which is unconventional for free vibration responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available