4.6 Article

A Facile and Efficient Bromination of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14123161

Keywords

MWCNT; bromination; functionalization; X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Science Centre in Poland [2015/19/N/ST8/03922, 2017/27/N/ST8/00662]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bromination of multi-walled carbon nanotubes was conducted using vapor bromine in a closed vessel and intensive stirring for up to 14 days. Physicochemical analyses confirmed bromine covalently binding to the nanotubes and the formation of inclusion complexes. The best results were obtained after 10 days of bromination, with a content of covalently bound bromine of 0.68 at%.
The bromination of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) was performed with vapor bromine in a closed vessel, and they were subjected to intensive stirring with a magnetic stirrer for up to 14 days. The efficiency of bromination was compared depending upon duration. The structure and surface of the crude and purified products were characterized by detailed physicochemical analyses, such as SEM/EDS, TEM, XRD, TGA, Raman, and XPS spectroscopies. The studies confirmed the presence of bromine covalently bound with nanotubes as well as the formation of inclusion MWCNT-Br-2 complexes. It was confirmed that Br-2 molecules are absorbed on the surface of nanotubes (forming the CNT-Br-2 complex), while they can dissociate close to dangling bonds at CNT defect sites with the formation of covalent C-Br bonds. Thus, any covalent attachment of bromine to the graphitic surface achieved around room temperature is likely related to the defects in the MWCNTs. The best results, i.e., the highest amount of attached Br-2, were obtained for brominated nanotubes brominated for 10 days, with the content of covalently bound bromine being 0.68 at% (by XPS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available