4.3 Article

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained from Intraoral and Extraoral Dental Scanners with Different CAD/CAM Scanning Technologies: An In Vitro Study

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral scans

Mohammad Taghi Baghani et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the accuracy of intraoral and extraoral scanners in complete-arch scans, with the Carestream scanner showing the lowest accuracy when scanning both mucosa and teeth. Other scanners tested may be suitable alternatives to conventional impression techniques.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2021)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison

Christine Keul et al.

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study

Pokpong Amornvit et al.

JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING (2020)

Article Chemistry, Multidisciplinary

The Accuracy of Three Intraoral Scanners in the Oral Environment with and without Saliva: A Comparative Study

Biagio Rapone et al.

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL (2020)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence

Burcu Diker et al.

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS (2020)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision

Sang J. Lee et al.

DENTISTRY JOURNAL (2020)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows

Ji-Young Sim et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study

Francesco Guido Mangano et al.

BMC ORAL HEALTH (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo

Patricia Bosniac et al.

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch

Priscilla Medina-Sotomayor et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

A New Method for Prediction of Dental Arch Perimeter

Nadia Basim Al-Ansari et al.

CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY (2019)

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review

Pekka Ahlholm et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY (2018)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization

Jan-Frederik Gueth et al.

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems

Marwa Shembesh et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

The Use of CAD/CAM Technology for Fabricating Cast Gold Survey Crowns under Existing Partial Removable Dental Prosthesis. A Clinical Report

Tarek El Kerdani et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional. and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions

Jeison B. Carbajal Mejia et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons

Walter Renne et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

The accuracy of the CAD system using intraoral and extraoral scanners for designing of fixed dental prostheses

Sakura Shimizu et al.

DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Comparison of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by 3-dimensional printing and conventional stone models with different degrees of crowding

Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns

S. Berrendero et al.

Clinical Oral Investigations (2016)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations

Heike Rudolph et al.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE (2016)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review

Su Ting-shu et al.

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY (2015)

Editorial Material Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios

Devan Naidu et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS (2013)

Editorial Material Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements

Marines Vieira S. Sousa et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS (2012)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology

Anna S. K. Persson et al.

DENTAL MATERIALS (2008)