4.3 Article

Design and simulation of reliable and fast nanomagnetic conservative quantum-dot cellular automata (NCQCA) gate

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1992-2000

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10825-021-01763-y

Keywords

QCA; Field-coupled nanocomputing; Nanomagnetic logic; Conservative logic; Testable NML

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the design of nanomagnetic conservative quantum-dot cellular automata gate, which can be used as the basic block for more complex conservative NML circuits, and the design of clocked nanomagnetic majority gate. OOMMF physical simulation tool is used for evaluation, showing correct functionality of the conservative gate at room temperature.
Nanomagnetic logic (NML) is a promising candidate for the real implementation of quantum-dot cellular automata circuits and can be a proper alternative or complement to CMOS circuits. Like any other nanoscale technologies, NML circuits are also subject to fabrication variations. These variations along with fluctuations caused by thermal noise can affect the performance of these circuits. Therefore, design of NML circuits with high testability is an absolute necessity. Circuits based on conservative logic are inherently testable because of their specific properties. In this paper, considering the physical and geometrical properties of nanomagnets, a nanomagnetic conservative quantum-dot cellular automata gate is designed and evaluated. This circuit can be used as the basic block for the realization of more complex conservative NML circuits. To implement this circuit, the design of the clocked nanomagnetic majority gate is also provided. The OOMMF physical simulation tool is used for simulation and evaluation. The results show the correct functionality of the proposed conservative gate at room temperature. It operates about 34% faster than the NML Fredkin gate. Moreover, the NML version of the conventional Fredkin gate takes 90% more area than the proposed design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available