4.3 Article

Thermal interactions in large irregular fields of geothermal boreholes: the method of equivalent boreholes

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 446-460

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2021.1968953

Keywords

Ground-coupled heat pumps; geothermal boreholes; g-functions; finite line source; thermal interactions; hierarchical agglomerative clustering

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-201804471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The new method presented in the study extends the FLS solution and utilizes equivalent boreholes and hierarchical agglomerative clustering to accurately evaluate thermal interactions between groups of vertical geothermal boreholes, significantly reducing calculation times and providing accurate results even for large borefields.
A new method is presented to evaluate thermal interactions between vertical geothermal boreholes. The finite line source (FLS) solution is extended to consider thermal interactions between groups of boreholes. Groups of boreholes that share similar temperatures and heat extraction rates are identified using hierarchical agglomerative clustering, and each group is represented in the model as a single equivalent borehole. Each equivalent borehole is split into segments, and temporal and spatial superposition of the FLS solution are employed to calculate the total temperature change along the length of the equivalent boreholes. The new method is shown to provide an accurate calculation of the g-function, with a mean absolute percentage error below 0.612% on the g-functions of regular borefields of up to 144 boreholes using only 3 to 5 equivalent boreholes. Calculation times are significantly reduced: the g-function of a borefield of 1024 randomly positioned boreholes is calculated in 3.65 s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available