Journal
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 82-100Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2021.03.010
Keywords
Sub-Saharan Africa; Benefits of trade; Electricity access; Power sector modelling; Development
Funding
- Charles University Grant Agency [829 317]
- H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [681 228]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Sub-Saharan Africa still has a long way to go in ensuring reliable and affordable power supply. Increasing power trade among countries in the region can reduce supply costs, improve supply efficiency, and decrease the costs for new customers. Furthermore, trade can also contribute significantly to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Sub-Saharan Africa has a long way to go to ensure reliable and affordable power for all. Currently, over half of the population lacks access to electricity and many of those with access face reliability issues, affecting their ability to get electricity when needed. Sub-Saharan Africa is also a region confronted with very high supply costs, significantly contributing to the lack of access. Increased power trade has the potential to reduce the cost of supply and hence play a vital role in overcoming the challenges of increasing electricity access. In this paper we analyse the benefits of trade among countries in the Southern African Power Pool, focussing on how international trade can reduce the underlying costs of supply and therefore the costs of providing electricity. Our analysis, based on a least-cost power sector expansion model, shows that the existing interconnection capacity is not utilized efficiently, meaning that countries are forgoing some benefits of power trade in the short term and also benefits of taking a regional approach to power system planning. This in turn increases the costs of supplying existing and new customers. Utilizing the existing interconnectors efficiently and building and using new interconnectors when economically beneficial to do so reduces forward-looking costs of generation by almost 6% compared to no trade. The saving is largely a result of less generation capacity being needed with full trade. Trade can also significantly contribute towards meeting other objectives, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, with trade less coal fired generation is required, particularly in South Africa and Zimbabwe, and more hydro capacity is developed elsewhere in the region, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Mozambique. (c) 2021 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available