4.4 Article

Symmetrized systematic molecular fragmentation model and its application for molecular properties

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 1202, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113303

Keywords

Molecular fragmentation; Electron-correlated methods; Intermolecular interactions; Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory

Funding

  1. PL-Grid infrastructure
  2. PCSS infrastructure
  3. PRACE-6IP [823767]
  4. MNISW [DIR/WK/2016/18]
  5. National Science Centre of Poland [2017/27/B/ST4/02699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel molecular fragmentation method based on the SMF model has been proposed, allowing for cheaper calculations with accurate results. Numerical tests show that the Symmetrized SMF method can accurately reproduce molecular energies and dipole moments, making it suitable for complex molecular structures.
A novel molecular fragmentation method is proposed, which is based on the Systematic Molecular Fragmentation (SMF) model of Collins [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 7744 (2012)]. In comparison to the original SMF model, which produces large fragments for branched molecules, sizes of fragments in the new scheme correspond exactly to the requested fragmentation level, which in turn allows for cheaper calculations at advanced electroncorrelated levels of theory. Additionally, the new approach treats a local bonding pattern around branching points in a symmetric way at cost of the introduction of fractional weights for some fragments. Numerical tests of the new method, denoted as Symmetrized SMF, show that already the third level of fragmentation reproduces molecular energies and dipole moments accurately enough for tested molecules. A hybrid model for the SSMF with conjunction of the Hartree-Fock and Moller-Plesset theories has been proposed, where the nonbonding interactions are calculated with Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available