4.2 Article

Content of circulating tumor DNA depends on the tumor type and the dynamics of tumor size, but is not influenced significantly by physical exercise, time of the day or recent meal

Journal

CANCER GENETICS
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages 165-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2021.05.014

Keywords

Circulating tumor DNA; Genotyping; ddPCR; KRAS mutations; BRAF mutations; EGFR mutations

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation Russian Science Foundation (RSF) [18-7510070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the presence of ctDNA in plasma is characteristic for patients with progressing tumor disease. Consecutive plasma tests may occasionally provide discordant data, and repetition of analysis may be advised in certain cases to ensure the validity of negative ctDNA result.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate factors, which influence the content of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Methods: 398 serial plasma samples were collected within 1-7 consecutive days from patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer ( n = 13), RAS/RAF-mutated colorectal cancer ( n = 54) and BRAF-mutated melanoma ( n = 17), who presented with measurable tumor disease. The amount of ctDNA was determined by ddPCR. Results: Among 82 patients, who donated 2-6 serial plasma samples, 42 subjects were classified as ctDNA-positive; only 22% cases were mutation-positive across all consecutive tests, while 24/82 (29%) patients showed presence of mutated ctDNA in some but not all blood draws. Subjects with progressing tumors had higher probability of being detected ctDNA-positive as compared to patients, who responded to therapy or had stable disease (39/55 (71%) vs. 4/24 (17%); p = 0.0 0 01). Our study failed to reveal the impact of the time of the day, recent meal or prior physical exercise on the results of ctDNA testing. Conclusions: Presence of ctDNA in plasma is particularly characteristic for patients, who experience clinical progression of tumor disease. Consecutive plasma tests may occasionally provide discordant data; thus, the repetition of analysis may be advised in certain cases in order to ensure the validity of negative ctDNA result. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available