4.6 Article

Disease recurrence in localized scleroderma: a retrospective analysis of 344 patients with paediatric- or adult-onset disease

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 3, Pages 722-728

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13514

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Localized scleroderma (LoS) is characterized by a phase of disease activity followed by remission. However, disease recurrences occur. Knowledge concerning these recurrences can help prompt treatment, thereby preventing disease damage. Objectives To investigate the frequency and characteristics of disease recurrences in paediatric-and adult-onset LoS, and to identify patient variables that are associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence. Methods Retrospective chart reviews were performed of patients with LoS. Data concerning the frequency and characteristics of the disease recurrences were collected. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify patient variables that were associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence. Results In total, 344 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 119 (35%) had paediatric-onset LoS and 225 (65%) had adult-onset LoS. Disease recurrence was present in 27% (n = 32) of the paediatric-onset group and 17% (n = 39) of the adult-onset group (P = 0.037). Multivariate analysis identified a statistically significant association between disease recurrence and the linear LoS of the limbs subtype, independent of age at disease onset. Conclusions Recurrences in LoS occurred in almost one-quarter of the patients and were most frequent in the linear LoS of the limbs subtype, independent of age at disease onset. These disease recurrences can occur even after many years of quiescent disease. Awareness of the high recurrence rates may help treating physicians to recognize reactivation of the disease, leading to a decreased delay in treatment reinitiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available