4.8 Review

Enzymatic Hydroxylations of sp3-Carbons

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 11, Issue 15, Pages 9168-9203

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c00759

Keywords

flavin-dependent enzyme; monooxygenase; unspecific peroxygenase; P450; hydroxylation; biocatalysis; oxyfunctionalization

Funding

  1. Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung fur die Freiheit
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (Biotechnologie 2020+ Strukturvorhaben: Leibniz Research Cluster) [031A360B]
  3. Landesgraduiertenforderung Sachsen-Anhalt
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0905100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The enzymatic hydroxylation of activated and nonactivated sp(3)-carbons is challenging in organic synthesis, but nature provides a variety of enzymes with catalytic versatility to tackle this task. Different enzymes have distinct specificity in substrate scope, selectivity, activity, stability, and catalytic cycle, and factors such as heterologous production, crystal structure availability, enzyme engineering potential, and substrate promiscuity play crucial roles in the applicability of these biocatalysts.
Enzymatic hydroxylation of activated and nonactivated sp(3)-carbons attracts keen interest from the chemistry community as it is one of the most challenging tasks in organic synthesis. Nature provides a vast number of enzymes with an enormous catalytic versatility to fulfill this task. Given that those very different enzymes have a distinct specificity in substrate scope, selectivity, activity, stability, and catalytic cycle, it is interesting to outline similarities and differences. In this Review, we intend to delineate which enzymes possess considerable advantages within specific issues. Heterologous production, crystal structure availability, enzyme engineering potential, and substrate promiscuity are essential factors for the applicability of these biocatalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available