4.8 Article

Deactivated Pt Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction: The Regeneration Mechanism and a Regenerative Protocol

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 11, Issue 15, Pages 9293-9299

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c01680

Keywords

PEM fuel cell; cathode poisoning; oxygen reduction reaction; sulfur dioxide; regeneration

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0101207]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21733004]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB932303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that dynamic potential scanning can gradually regenerate poisoned Pt/C, and that SO2 can be converted to easily oxidized forms at a low potential. Based on this mechanism, a square wave-based protocol is proposed to completely regenerate SO2-poisoned Pt surfaces within an unprecedented three cycles.
Ambient contaminants, e.g., sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead to severe Pt deactivation and performance loss of practical proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells, which need to be removed immediately. We herein find that only partially adsorbed SO2 can be oxidized and removed at up to 1.5 V, even for a longer period. By contrast, interestingly, dynamic potential scanning for several cycles (usually > 8) can gradually regenerate poisoned Pt/C. In situ infrared spectroscopy demonstrates that parallel-bonded SO2 is forbidden to be electro-oxidized at a high potential but can be converted to easily oxidized atop-bonded and bridge-bonded SO2 at a low potential. Due to the potential-dependent transformation, SO2 is gradually oxidized and removed under dynamic potential scanning instead of potentiostatic polarization. Based on this regeneration mechanism, we propose a square wave-based protocol to completely regenerate SO2-poisoned Pt surfaces within unprecedented three cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available