4.8 Article

A robotic prebiotic chemist probes long term reactions of complexifying mixtures

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23828-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. John Templeton Foundation [60025]
  2. EPSRC [EP/L023652/1, EP/R01308X/1, EP/J015156/1, EP/P00153X/1]
  3. Breakthrough Prize Foundation
  4. NASA [80NSSC18K1140]
  5. ERC [670467 SMART-POM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to experimentally test hypotheses about the emergence of living systems from abiotic chemistry, researchers have developed a robotic prebiotic chemist equipped with an automatic sensor system. This system is capable of running intelligent, automated, and long-term experiments to explore chemical space, producing high complexity molecules from simple precursors. It represents a necessary step towards the design of new types of Origin of Life experiments.
To experimentally test hypotheses about the emergence of living systems from abiotic chemistry, researchers need to be able to run intelligent, automated, and long-term experiments to explore chemical space. Here we report a robotic prebiotic chemist equipped with an automatic sensor system designed for long-term chemical experiments exploring unconstrained multicomponent reactions, which can run autonomously over long periods. The system collects mass spectrometry data from over 10 experiments, with 60 to 150 algorithmically controlled cycles per experiment, running continuously for over 4 weeks. We show that the robot can discover the production of high complexity molecules from simple precursors, as well as deal with the vast amount of data produced by a recursive and unconstrained experiment. This approach represents what we believe to be a necessary step towards the design of new types of Origin of Life experiments that allow testable hypotheses for the emergence of life from prebiotic chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available