4.8 Article

Comprehensive characterization of 536 patient-derived xenograft models prioritizes candidatesfor targeted treatment

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25177-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [U54-CA224083, HHSN261200800001E]
  2. Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital's Cancer Frontier Fund through the Siteman Cancer Center Investment Program
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York, Inc.
  5. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program, Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) grant [CA070907]
  6. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [NCI R50-CA211199, HHSN261201400008C, 17x146, HHSN261201500003I, 75N91019D00024]
  7. NCI [P30CA042014]
  8. P30 Cancer Center Support Grant [CA125123]
  9. Cancer Research and Prevention Initiative of Texas [RP170691]
  10. NIH [NCI U24-CA224067, NCI U54-CA224083, NCI U54-CA224070, NCI U54-CA224065, NCI U54-CA224076, NCI U54-CA233223, NCI U54-CA233306]
  11. National Cancer Institute under the JAX Cancer Center NCI Grant [P30CA034196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents genomic landscapes of 536 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models across 25 cancer types, providing insights into their molecular features and suitability for clinical trials. PDXs typically have higher purity than human tumors and are useful for investigating dynamic driver events and molecular properties, making them valuable tools in cancer research and drug development.
Patient-derived xenograft models (PDX) have been extensively used to study the molecular and clinical features of cancers. Here the authors present a cohort of 536 PDX models from 25 cancers, as well as their genomic and evolutionary profiles and their suitability for clinical trials. Development of candidate cancer treatments is a resource-intensive process, with the research community continuing to investigate options beyond static genomic characterization. Toward this goal, we have established the genomic landscapes of 536 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models across 25 cancer types, together with mutation, copy number, fusion, transcriptomic profiles, and NCI-MATCH arms. Compared with human tumors, PDXs typically have higher purity and fit to investigate dynamic driver events and molecular properties via multiple time points from same case PDXs. Here, we report on dynamic genomic landscapes and pharmacogenomic associations, including associations between activating oncogenic events and drugs, correlations between whole-genome duplications and subclone events, and the potential PDX models for NCI-MATCH trials. Lastly, we provide a web portal having comprehensive pan-cancer PDX genomic profiles and source code to facilitate identification of more druggable events and further insights into PDXs' recapitulation of human tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available