4.8 Article

Cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis identifies six breast cancer loci in African and European ancestry women

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24327-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01-CA142996, R01-CA89085, R01-CA228198, P20-CA233307, R03-CA227357, R01-CA242929, P01-CA151135, R01-CA098663, R01-CA058420, UM1-CA164974, R01-CA100598, P50-CA58223]
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation [BCRF-20-071]
  3. Basser Center for BRCA
  4. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Era of Hope Scholar Award [W81XWH-08-1-0383]
  5. Norris Foundation
  6. National Institutes of Health [R01-CA100598, R01-CA63464, R37-CA54281, R01-CA077305, U01-CA069417, R01-CA100374]
  7. National Institute for Child Health and Development [NO1-HD-3-3175, K05 CA136967]
  8. U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command (USAMRMC) grant [DAMD-17-01-0-0334]
  9. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  10. United States Army Medical Research Program grant [DAMD-17-96-6071]
  11. National Institutes of Health Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Breast Cancer [P50-CA58223]
  12. Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health [P30-ES10126]
  13. Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  14. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [RFA-CA-06-503]
  15. Tower Cancer Research Foundation
  16. University Cancer Research Fund of North Carolina
  17. Susan G. Komen Foundation
  18. Karin Grunebaum Foundation
  19. Cancer Research UK [C1287/A16563, C1287/A10118]
  20. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [634935, 633784]
  21. European Communitys Seventh Framework Program [223175, HEALTH-F2-2009-223175]
  22. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [Z01-ES044005]
  23. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under NCI Contract [75N910D00024]
  24. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [633784] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a cross-ancestry approach, the study identified seven new variants associated with breast cancer risk among women of African ancestry, shedding light on the genetic basis of breast cancer in different populations and emphasizing the importance of replication across multiple ancestry populations to identify causal variants.
GWAS have enhanced our understanding for the genetic basis of breast cancer, but the majority of them were performed for European ancestry populations. Here, the authors use a cross-ancestry approach and report seven new variants associated with breast cancer risk among women of African ancestry. Our study describes breast cancer risk loci using a cross-ancestry GWAS approach. We first identify variants that are associated with breast cancer at P < 0.05 from African ancestry GWAS meta-analysis (9241 cases and 10193 controls), then meta-analyze with European ancestry GWAS data (122977 cases and 105974 controls) from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The approach identifies four loci for overall breast cancer risk [1p13.3, 5q31.1, 15q24 (two independent signals), and 15q26.3] and two loci for estrogen receptor-negative disease (1q41 and 7q11.23) at genome-wide significance. Four of the index single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) lie within introns of genes (KCNK2, C5orf56, SCAMP2, and SIN3A) and the other index SNPs are located close to GSTM4, AMPD2, CASTOR2, and RP11-168G16.2. Here we present risk loci with consistent direction of associations in African and European descendants. The study suggests that replication across multiple ancestry populations can help improve the understanding of breast cancer genetics and identify causal variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available