4.7 Article

Prognostic correlations with the microbiome of breast cancer subtypes

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-04092-x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Avon Foundation [Avon-02-2012-053]
  2. Abramson Cancer Center Director's fund
  3. Penn Innovational StartUp company ExcaliViR Inc.
  4. BioRad Laboratories Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alterations to the natural microbiome are linked to different diseases, and the presence or absence of specific microbes is directly related to disease outcomes. The study found that different subtypes of breast cancer have specific viromes and microbiomes, with ER+ and TN tumors showing the most and least diverse microbiome, respectively. Specific microbial signatures allowed discrimination between different BC subtypes and correlated with clinical outcomes.
Alterations to the natural microbiome are linked to different diseases, and the presence or absence of specific microbes is directly related to disease outcomes. We performed a comprehensive analysis with unique cohorts of the four subtypes of breast cancer (BC) characterized by their microbial signatures, using a pan-pathogen microarray strategy. The signature (includes viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites) of each tumor subtype was correlated with clinical data to identify microbes with prognostic potential. The subtypes of BC had specific viromes and microbiomes, with ER+ and TN tumors showing the most and least diverse microbiome, respectively. The specific microbial signatures allowed discrimination between different BC subtypes. Furthermore, we demonstrated correlations between the presence and absence of specific microbes in BC subtypes with the clinical outcomes. This study provides a comprehensive map of the oncobiome of BC subtypes, with insights into disease prognosis that can be critical for precision therapeutic intervention strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available