4.5 Article

Cellular, Metabolic, and Developmental Dimensions of Whole-Body Regeneration in Hydra

Journal

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040725

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003_169930, 310030_189122]
  2. Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3)
  3. Galliot laboratory
  4. Canton of Geneva
  5. Claraz Donation
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_189122] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydra regeneration requires conditions such as adult stem cells, autophagy, and reactive oxygen species signals. Injury triggers immediate production of ROS signals and complex regulatory loops to promote regeneration. Regenerative capacity of Hydra diminishes rapidly with age due to unfavorable homeostatic conditions.
Here we discuss the developmental and homeostatic conditions necessary for Hydra regeneration. Hydra is characterized by populations of adult stem cells paused in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, ready to respond to injury signals. The body column can be compared to a blastema-like structure, populated with multifunctional epithelial stem cells that show low sensitivity to proapoptotic signals, and high inducibility of autophagy that promotes resistance to stress and starvation. Intact Hydra polyps also exhibit a dynamic patterning along the oral-aboral axis under the control of homeostatic organizers whose activity results from regulatory loops between activators and inhibitors. As in bilaterians, injury triggers the immediate production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) signals that promote wound healing and contribute to the reactivation of developmental programs via cell death and the de novo formation of new organizing centers from somatic tissues. In aging Hydra, regeneration is rapidly lost as homeostatic conditions are no longer pro-regenerative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available