4.6 Review

Location Matters: Navigating Regional Heterogeneity of the Neurovascular Unit

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.696540

Keywords

neurovascular unit; regional heterogeneity; blood-brain barrier; pericytes; astrocytes; endothelial cell

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondation Leducq [15CVD02]
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  3. FWO [MEDI-RESCU2-AKUL/17/049, G091719N, 1197818N]
  4. VIB Tech-Watch (fUSI-MICE)
  5. Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders (NERF) TechDev fund (3D-fUSI project)
  6. Brazil Family Program for Neurology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neurovascular unit (NVU) in the brain exhibits spatial heterogeneity, with variations in cellular composition and functional specialization across different brain regions. This diversity is crucial for brain function.
The neurovascular unit (NVU) of the brain is composed of multiple cell types that act synergistically to modify blood flow to locally match the energy demand of neural activity, as well as to maintain the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). It is becoming increasingly recognized that the functional specialization, as well as the cellular composition of the NVU varies spatially. This heterogeneity is encountered as variations in vascular and perivascular cells along the arteriole-capillary-venule axis, as well as through differences in NVU composition throughout anatomical regions of the brain. Given the wide variations in metabolic demands between brain regions, especially those of gray vs. white matter, the spatial heterogeneity of the NVU is critical to brain function. Here we review recent evidence demonstrating regional specialization of the NVU between brain regions, by focusing on the heterogeneity of its individual cellular components and briefly discussing novel approaches to investigate NVU diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available