4.1 Article

Life expectancy in older adults with advanced cancer: Evaluation of a geriatric assessment-based prognostic model

Journal

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 176-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.08.009

Keywords

Geriatric assessment; Advanced cancer; Prediction modeling

Funding

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Program [4634]
  2. National Cancer Institute at the National Institute of Health [UG1 CA189961, K99CA237744]
  3. National Institute on Aging at the National Institute of Health [K24 AG056589, R33 AG059206, KL2 TR001999]
  4. Wilmot Research Fellowship Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a prognostic model for older adults with advanced cancer based on geriatric assessment and compared its performance to alternative models. The results showed that the geriatric assessment model had moderate discrimination and improved calibration for survival prediction. Further research is needed to optimize the use of geriatric assessment-based prognostic models in older adults with advanced cancer.
Objectives: Oncologists estimate patients' prognosis to guide care. Evidence suggests oncologists tend to overestimate life expectancy, which can lead to care with questionable benefits. Information obtained from geriatric assessment may improve prognostication for older adults. In this study, we created a geriatric assessment-based prognostic model for older adults with advanced cancer and compared its performance to alternative models. Materials and methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a trial (URCC 13070; PI: Mohile) capturing geriatric assessment and vital status up to one year for adults age >= 70 years with advanced cancer. Oncologists estimated life expectancy as 0-6 months, 7-12 months, and > 1 year. Three statistical models were developed: (1) a model including age, sex, cancer type, and stage (basic model), (2) basic model + Karnofsky Performance Status (<= 50, 60-70, and 80+) (KPS model), and (3) basic model +16 binary indicators of geriatric assessment impairments (GA model). Cox regression was used to model one-year survival; c-indices and time-dependent c-statistics assessed model discrimination and stratified survival curves assessed model calibration. Results: We included 484 participants; mean age was 75; 48% had gastrointestinal or lung cancer. Overall, 43% of patients died within one year. Oncologists classified prognosis accurately for 55% of patients, overestimated for 35%, and underestimated for 10%. C-indices were 0.61 (basic model), 0.62 (KPS model), and 0.63 (GA model). The GA model was well-calibrated. Conclusions: The GA model showed moderate discrimination for survival, similar to alternative models, but calibration was improved. Further research is needed to optimize geriatric assessment-based prognostic models for use in older adults with advanced cancer. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available