4.5 Review

Professional success of men in the nursing workforce: An integrative review

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 2470-2488

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13445

Keywords

career success; gender segmentation; inequality; male nurses; men in nursing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Male nurses face challenges in achieving professional success, as they are overrepresented in senior nursing positions with higher salaries but also experience gender stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination, leading to shorter duration in specific positions.
Aim: To identify and summarize evidence of objective achievements and subjective indicators associated with professional success of men in nursing. Background: Despite being a minority group, men in nursing are purported to enjoy hidden advantages. Evaluation: In this integrative review, studies from seven databases were retrieved and independently evaluated using the quality appraisal tools in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Inductive content analysis and narrative synthesis were conducted, guided by the aim of this review. Key issues: In total, 12 studies published between 1987 and 2021 were included. Two themes with related subthemes supporting or refuting professional success of men were identified. These were (a) evidence of professional success and (b) challenges to professional success. Conclusion: As a minority group, men are highly visible in nursing, which is a doubleedged sword. Although men were overrepresented in senior nursing positions of higher salaries than women, they also experienced gender stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination, which reduced the duration of men staying in a specific nursing position. Implications for Nursing Management: Findings of this study highlighted the need for nurse leaders to proactively address specific gender issues that are unique to men in the nursing workforce.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available