4.5 Article

Effect of Thickness and Infill Density on Acoustic Performance of 3D Printed Panels made of Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages 7132-7140

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1944426

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; fused deposition modeling; 3D printed biodegradable acoustic panel; natural fiber-reinforced composites; sound absorption; infill density

Funding

  1. Taylor's University Flagship Research Grant [TUFR/2017/001/05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Additive manufacturing (AM) of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites through Fused Deposition Modeling is being actively researched, with the ability to control sound absorption performance by varying thickness and infill density of the acoustic panel. The study found that the thin panel with back air gap absorbed sound in the mid-frequency range resembling a Helmholtz resonator, while the absorption performance of the thick panel was controlled by infill density. The customization of acoustic absorption for panels made from biodegradable materials by AM is achievable.
Additive manufacturing (AM) of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites through Fused Deposition Modeling is receiving much attention in recent years. AM is very appealing for complex shape structures that can be inconvenient to produce by other methods. In this study, the acoustic panel made from polylactic acid reinforced with wood fiber composite was 3D printed by varying its thickness and infill density. The sound absorption coefficient was measured using an impedance tube. The thin panel with back air gap was found to absorb sound at mid-frequency range resembling the Helmholtz resonator. The absorption performance for the thick panel can be controlled by controlling the infill density of the panel. Customizing the acoustic absorption is therefore possible for panels from biodegradable materials by AM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available