4.6 Article

Lipofection with Synthetic mRNA as a Simple Method for T-Cell Immunomonitoring

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13071232

Keywords

transfection; ivt mRNA; immunomonitoring; lipofection; TLR7; 8; T-cells

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Zurich (URPP Translational Cancer Research)
  2. department of Dermatology at the University Hospital of Zurich
  3. Stiftung fur wissenschaftliche Forschung an der Universitat Zurich
  4. Swiss National Science Found NRP 78 program [4078PO_198321]
  5. EU grant NEWmRNA (Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme) [965135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a simple method for determining in vitro T-cell responses by lipofection of synthetic mRNA in mononuclear cells. The results demonstrate that antigen-specific T-cell immune monitoring can be easily and quickly performed using this method. This work provides a convenient solution for the in vitro monitoring of natural or therapy-induced T-cell immune responses.
The quantification of T-cell immune responses is crucial for the monitoring of natural and treatment-induced immunity, as well as for the validation of new immunotherapeutic approaches. The present study presents a simple method based on lipofection of synthetic mRNA in mononuclear cells as a method to determine in vitro T-cell responses. We compared several commercially available transfection reagents for their potential to transfect mRNA into human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and murine splenocytes. We also investigated the impact of RNA modifications in improving this method. Our results demonstrate that antigen-specific T-cell immunomonitoring can be easily and quickly performed by simple lipofection of antigen-coding mRNA in complex immune cell populations. Thus, our work discloses a convenient solution for the in vitro monitoring of natural or therapy-induced T-cell immune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available