4.5 Article

Including fossils in phylogeny: a glimpse into the evolution of the superfamily Evanioidea (Hymenoptera: Apocrita) under tip-dating and the fossilized birth-death process

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 194, Issue 4, Pages 1396-1423

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab034

Keywords

amber; Bayesian inference; calibration; morphological phylogeny; time divergence; wasps

Categories

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]
  2. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research [2019QZKK0706]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41688103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new phylogeny of the superfamily Evanioidea is proposed using a fossilized birth-death model, estimating divergence times and proving the monophyly of Evanioidea. Additionally, three new othniodellithid wasps are described in this study.
Using a fossilized birth-death model, a new phylogeny of the superfamily Evanioidea (including ensign wasps, nightshade wasps and hatchet wasps) is proposed, with estimates of divergence times for its constitutive families and for corroborating the monophyly of Evanioidea. Additionally, our Bayesian analyses demonstrate the monophyly of dagger Anomopterellidae, dagger Othniodellithidae, dagger Andreneliidae, Aulacidae, Gasteruptiida and Evaniidae, whereas dagger Praeaulacidae and dagger Baissidae appear to be paraphyletic. Vectevania vetula and Hyptiogastrites electrinus are transferred to Aulacidae. We estimate the divergence time of Evanioidea to be in the Late Triassic (similar to 203 Mya). Additionally, three new othniodellithid wasps are described and figured from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber as the new genus Keratodellitha, with three new species: Keratodellitha anubis sp. nov., Keratodellitha basilisci sp. nov. and Keratodellitha kirin sp. nov. We also document a temporal shift in relative species richness between Ichneumonoidea and Evanioidea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available