4.4 Article

Species-rich bark and ambrosia beetle fauna (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) of the Ecuadorian Amazonian Forest Canopy

Journal

ZOOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 1044, Pages 797-813

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1044.57849

Keywords

ambrosia beetles; bark beetles; diversity; neotropical; rainforest; Terry Erwin

Categories

Funding

  1. Ecuambiente Consulting Group, Ecuador
  2. Casey Fund, Department of Entomology, NMNH
  3. NMNH Lowland Amazon Project
  4. NSF-PEET grant [DEB-0328920]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Canopy fogging was used to sample the diversity of bark and ambrosia beetles in two western Amazonian rainforest sites in Ecuador. A subset of the data analyzed in this study found high diversity of these beetles, with a total species richness estimated between 260 and 323. However, undersampling was identified as a limitation affecting the accuracy of beta diversity estimates.
Canopy fogging was used to sample the diversity of bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) at two western Amazonian rainforest sites in Ecuador. Sampling was conducted by Dr Terry Erwin and assistants from 1994-2006 and yielded 1158 samples containing 2500 scolytine specimens representing more than 400 morphospecies. Here, we analyze a subset of these data representing two ecological groups: true bark beetles (52 morphospecies) and ambrosia beetles (69 morphospecies). A high percentage of these taxa occurred as singletons and doubletons and their species accumulation curves did not reach an asymptote. Diversity estimates placed the total scolytine species richness for this taxon subset present at the two sites between 260 and 323 species. The alpha-diversity was remarkably high at each site, while the apparently high beta-diversity was an artifact of undersampling, as shown by a Monte Carlo resampling analysis. This study demonstrates the utility of canopy fogging for the discovery of new scolytine taxa and for approximate diversity assessment, but a substantially greater sampling effort would be needed for conclusive alpha as well as beta diversity estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available