4.6 Article

Assessment of the value of adjuvant radiotherapy for treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma based on pattern of post-surgical progression

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02304-4

Keywords

Gastric carcinoma; Radical resection (R0); Local recurrence; Adjuvant radiotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that adjuvant radiotherapy can effectively reduce the local recurrence rate in patients with certain clinicopathologic features of gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients with poorly differentiated cancer cells, advanced T stage, and positive lymph nodes are recommended for adjuvant radiotherapy to improve outcomes.
Purpose To assess the value of adjuvant radiotherapy for treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma and to investigate subgroups of patients suitable for adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods and materials Data from 785 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who had undergone D1/D2 radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were collected, the site of first progression was determined, and the relationship between the rate of local recurrence and clinicopathologic features was analyzed. Results By the end of the follow-up period, progression was observed in 405 patients. Local recurrence was observed as the first progression in 161 cases. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower than the non-local progression rate (20.5% vs 31.5%, p=0.007). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant relationship among degree of differentiation, T stage, N stage, and rate of local recurrence. Conclusions Not all patients with gastric carcinoma required adjuvant radiotherapy. However, patients with poorly differentiated cancer cells, advanced T stage (T3/T4), and positive lymph nodes, which included patients in the T4N1-2M0 subgroup, were recommended for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available