4.7 Article

Advanced damage resistance monitoring procedure on the composite materials? surface-exposed to cavitation testing

Journal

WEAR
Volume 474, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203877

Keywords

Ceramic-matrix composite; Cavitation erosion; Surface analysis; High temperature; Electron microscopy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [110-10/2019-000, 610-39/2021-060, 451-03-68/2020-14/200135, 1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the morphology and development of surface damage of alumina-based materials under cavitation erosion, with the application of principal component analysis to determine material resistance. Results show that the addition of ceramic fibers becomes significant after long periods of cavitation erosion, though the impact on damage morphology is not very observable in the initial stages.
Morphology and development of surface damage of alumina-based materials, resulting from cavitation erosion is studied in this paper. Two series of samples were prepared: samples without fibers and those with the addition of 2 wt % of ceramic fibers. The form of surface damage is considered to be the information carrier for the analysis of the resistance of materials to cavitation and the quality of this information is determined. The surface of the samples was monitored in defined time intervals in order to prepare the digitized image suitable for further analysis using image analysis software. The principal component analysis was applied to examine the appearance of certain morphological characteristics depending on the behavior of the material during cavitation erosion. It was concluded that the addition of ceramic fibers gained in importance after a long time of cavitation erosion, while during a starting period of time the difference in the morphology of the damage is not very observable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available