4.5 Article

Catalytic ozonation for the removal of reactive black 5 (RB-5) dye using zeolites modified with CuMn2O4/gC3N4 in a synergic electro flocculation-catalytic ozonation process

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 8, Pages 1943-1953

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2021.404

Keywords

catalyst; electroflocculation; ozonation; reactive black 5; zeolites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the decolourization efficiency of Reactive Black 5 (RB-5) dye using CuMn2O4/gC(3)N(4) coated Zeolites in a hybrid Electro-flocculation-catalytic ozonation process. The combination of catalytic ozonation with electro-flocculation was found to be the most effective treatment option, achieving a removal efficiency of 90.31% at pH 10 after 30 minutes.
This study aims to investigate the decolourization efficiency of Reactive Black 5 (RB-5) dye by using CuMn2O4/gC(3)N(4) coated Zeolites (zeolite 4A) for the first time in a hybrid Electro-flocculation-catalytic ozonation process. A comparison between various treatment options such as electro-flocculation, electro-flocculation in the presence of a catalyst, and catalytic ozonation in combination with electro-flocculation was explored. Moreover, the effect of different factors such as pH, time, catalyst dose, ozone dose, radical scavenger, and voltage has been studied in each treatment option mentioned earlier. The results indicated that the best treatment option was found to be catalytic ozonation in combination with electro-flocculation with removal efficiency (RE) of 90.31% at pH 10 after 30 minutes of the treatment process. The hydroxyl radical scavenger effect indicated that the synergistic catalytic process follows a radical mechanism. It is therefore concluded that CuMn2O4/gC(3)N(4)-Zeolite catalysts in synergic electro-flocculation-catalytic ozonation process may be effectively used for the treatment of textile wastewaters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available