4.8 Article

Light-induced fluorescence quenching leads to errors in sensor measurements of phytoplankton chlorophyll and phycocyaninS

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117133

Keywords

Cyanobacteria; Real-time monitoring; Fluorescence; Non-photochemical quenching; Water resources management

Funding

  1. Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship (GUPRS)
  2. Griffith University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (GUIPRS)
  3. Australia-Germany Joint Research Cooperation Scheme (of the German Academic Exchange Service, DAAD) [57446333]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical sensors for fluorescence of chlorophyll a and phycocyanin are commonly used proxies for algae and cyanobacteria biomass monitoring. However, fluctuations in light intensity can significantly suppress the fluorescence measurements, especially during bright conditions. Diel variations in light intensity need to be considered as a significant source of bias for fluorescence probes used for algal monitoring.
Optical sensors for fluorescence of chlorophyll a (f-Chl a ) and phycocyanin (f-PC) are increasingly used as a proxy for biomass of algae and cyanobacteria, respectively. They provide measurements at highfrequency and modest cost. These sensors require site-specific calibration due to a range of interferences. Light intensity affects the fluorescence yield of cyanobacteria and algae through light harvesting regulation mechanisms, but is often neglected as a potential source of error for in-situ f-Chl a and f-PC measurements. We hypothesised that diel light variations would induce significant f-Chl a and fPC suppression when compared to dark periods. We tested this hypothesis in a controlled experiment using three commercial fluorescence probes which continuously measured f-Chl a and f-PC from a culture of the cyanobacterium Dolichospermum variabilis as well as f-Chl a from a culture of the green alga Ankistrodesmus gracilis in a simulated natural light regime. Under light, all devices showed a significant ( p < 0.01) suppression of f-Chl a and f-PC compared to measurements in the dark. f-Chl a decreased by up to 79% and f-PC by up to 59% at maximum irradiance compared to dark-adapted periods. Suppression levels were higher during the second phase of the diel cycle (declining light), indicating that quenching is dependent on previous light exposure. Diel variations in light intensity must be considered as a significant source of bias for fluorescence probes used for algal monitoring. This is of high relevance as most monitoring activities take place during daytime and hence f-Chl a and f-PC are likely to be systematically underestimated under bright conditions. Compensation models, design modifications to fluorometers and sampling design are discussed as suitable alternatives to overcome light-induced fluorescence quenching. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available