4.8 Article

Electrosorptive removal of organic water constituents by positively charged electrically conductive UF membranes

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117318

Keywords

Electrically conductive membrane; Electrosorption; NOM

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [262559207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a novel approach of applying positive charge to a conductive membrane to induce electrosorption of negatively charged substances. Results show that this method can significantly increase flux and achieve high removal rates of contaminants.
Negatively charged electrically conductive ultrafiltration (UF) membranes have been intensively investigated for fouling mitigation and rejection enhancement in recent years. This study reports the novel approach of applying positive charge (+2.5 V cell potential) to a conductive membrane to induce electrosorption of negatively charged substances onto the membrane. Subsequently, desorption of negatively charged substances is achieved by changing the potential periodically (e.g., after 30 min) to negative charge (-2.5 V cell potential). For this purpose, sputter deposition of ultra-thin gold layers (40 nm) is used to generate electrically conductive gold-polymer-gold flat sheet membranes by coating the active and the support layer of two commercial polymer UF membranes (polyethersulfone UP150, polyamide M5). When M5 membrane was charged positively during filtration (+2.5 V), Suwannee River NOM, Hohloh lake NOM, humic acid and Brilliant Blue ionic dye showed removal rates of 70 %, 75% and 93% and 99%, respectively. Whereas, when no potential was applied (0 V) removal rates were only 1 - 5 %. When a positive potential was applied to the active membrane layer and a negative potential was applied to the support layer (cell potential 2.5 V), a significant increase of flux with 25 L/(m2 h) was observed due to the induction of electro-osmosis. Electrosorption was only observed for M5 membrane (zeta: +13 mV, pH 7) and not with UP150 membrane (zeta: -29 mV, pH 7). Due to a low current density of 1.1 A/m2 at a flux of 100 L/(m2 h), the additional energy consumption of electrosorption and desorption process was low with 0.03 kWh per m3 of permeate. This study delivered the proof of concept for the novel process of electrosorptive UF with energy consumption between microfiltration and ultrafiltration but NOM removal rates of nanofiltration membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available