4.7 Article

Towards a more efficient Hydrothermal Carbonization: Processing water recirculation under different conditions

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 115-123

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.023

Keywords

Hydrochars; Hydrothermal carbonization; Recycling process water

Funding

  1. Junta de Extremadura through project - FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional Una Manera de hacer Europa) [GR15034]
  2. Agencia Espanola de Investigacion [PID2020-116144RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the recirculation of Processing Water can increase the yield and heating value of hydrochar, especially in cyclic runs. There was an increase in carbon content of HC, and thermal degradation peaks showed a broader temperature range decomposition during cyclic runs.
The use of Processing Water (PW) on the Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of tunisian pine cones was investigated under different temperature (200 and 240 degrees C) and residence time conditions (3 and 20 h). Recirculating PW improved the HC (hydrochar) solid yield, without being detrimental to the carbon content of the HC. The heating value of the HCs, that with a single reaction already involved a rise of this parameter in the range 22.1-55.8% as compared to the raw material, was further increased up to 24.9-58.6% for cyclic runs. This was attributed to enhanced secondary char formation by reusing liquid, although this effect depended on the severity of previous HTC and was affected by both temperature and time. The HCs showed an increment on C and especially on N for cyclic runs. Also, thermal degradation peaks during HC TGA/DTA analyses showed a broader temperature range decomposition upon pyrolysis when PW was recirculated. The modifications of HC surface morphologies and functional groups was also investigated and associated to related reaction mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available