4.7 Article

Investigation of nitrogen loss during laboratory scale fixed-bed drying of digestate

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 26-34

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.003

Keywords

Digestate; Laboratory fixed-bed dryer; Nitrogen loss; Ammonia emission

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) [2818106415]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on the drying kinetics of digestate and the nitrogen loss during the drying process. A series of drying experiments were conducted on dewatered digestate, showing a significant reduction in total nitrogen and almost complete loss of ammonium nitrogen. The results will serve as the basis for further investigation of continuous digestate drying at a semi-technical scale.
In addition to the drying kinetics of digestate, a comprehensive knowledge is necessary on nitrogen loss and ammonia emissions in order to appropriately develop and design a dryer. Otherwise, these phenomena would result in environmental concerns and reduce the nutrient value of digestate. Expectedly, drying parameters considerably affect drying time. In this study, drying experiments were conducted at a laboratory scale fixed-bed dryer. The drying experiments were performed on dewatered digestate that mainly consisted of grass and maize silage (initial moisture content 76.4% w.b., 0.026 kg N kg(-1) DM). The drying air temperatures were adjusted to 60, 70 and 80 degrees C, the airflow rate varied between 150 and 250 m(3) h(-1), respectively. As the results have shown, the total nitrogen was reduced by 29 to 42% during drying. Almost all ammonium nitrogen was lost (92%). No relationship between nitrogen loss and drying air temperature or airflow rate could be proved. These results will be used as a basis for further investigation of continuous digestate drying at a semi-technical scale. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available