4.4 Article

Development of a SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid specific monoclonal antibody

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 558, Issue -, Pages 28-37

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2021.01.003

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 AI132668, R01 AI140442]
  2. Boettcher Foundation COVID Biomedical Research Innovation Fund
  3. Colorado State University Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology
  4. Colorado State University Office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New monoclonal antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, specifically mBG86, have been developed and validated for various analyses. The variable regions of six select clones were sequenced and epitope mapping was performed, showing promising value in the fight against COVID-19.
To help fight COVID-19, new molecular tools specifically targeting critical components of the causative agent of COVID-19, SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), are desperately needed. The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein is critical for viral replication, integral to viral particle assembly, and a major diagnostic marker for infection and immune protection. Currently the limited available antibody reagents targeting the nucleocapsid protein are not specific to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, and sequences for these antibodies are not publicly available. In this work we developed and characterized a series of new mouse monoclonal antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, with a specific clone, mBG86, targeting only SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. The monoclonal antibodies were validated in ELISA, Western blot, and immunofluorescence analyses. The variable regions from six select clones were cloned and sequenced, and preliminary epitope mapping of the sequenced clones was performed. Overall, these new antibody reagents will be of significant value in the fight against COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available