4.1 Article

Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Dissection Using Customized Single-Branched Fenestrated Stent-Graft

Journal

VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 577-585

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15385744211010446

Keywords

endovascular treatment; thoracic aorta; dissection; stent-graft; custom-made device

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair using customized single-branched fenestrated stent-grafts for aortic arch dissections showed high technical success rate and low 30-day mortality rate, with no observed stroke or migration of stent-grafts during follow-up.
Objectives: To report outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair using customized single-branched fenestrated stent-grafts in treatment of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: Between November 2009 and November 2011, 16 patients with aortic arch dissections underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair utilizing customized unibody single-branched fenestrated stent-graft (UBFSG) in our institution. Results: All 16 patients were male with mean age of 54.50 +/- 11.33. The technical success rate was 100%. 30-day mortality rate was 6.25% (n = 1). The median follow-up period was 98 months (range, 0-119). During follow-up, 4 nonaorta-related deaths were recorded. Two (2) cases of left subclavian artery occlusion were observed 12 and 14 months after the operation. Two (2) patients had another successful endovascular repair in time, including one case of type Ib endoleak occurred 100 months after the operation and one case of stent-graft induced new entry tear 38 months after the operation. No stroke and migration of stent-grafts were observed. Conclusions: The branched fenestrated stent-graft may be an effective alternative treatment for aortic arch dissections unfit for open surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available