4.5 Article

Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 39, Issue 29, Pages 3799-3802

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.055

Keywords

Adult immunization schedule; Recommendation; Vaccination; Attitudes

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1U01IP000849-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was established to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Physicians are comfortable using the Adult Immunization Schedule but report confusion about some medical condition-based indications. Future efforts should focus on increasing clarity regarding the recommendations and increasing awareness of mobile applications for physicians.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was created out of the need to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Annually, ACIP delivers recommendations to the CDC director for guidance about United States vaccine use and publishes the Adult Immunization Schedule. Updated schedules feature changes to vaccine recommendations as well as changes to the schedule's usability for physicians. The objective of this study was to determine physicians' attitudes about the Adult Immunization Schedule. Surveys were administered to a sentinel physician network from October 2019 through January 2020. Physicians that responded were comfortable using the Adult Immunization Schedule, but reported confusion about some medical condition-based indications. Physicians reported a lack engagement with mobile applications, CDC Vaccine Schedules and Shots by STFM (the Society for Teachers of Family Medicine). Future work should focus on increasing clarity regarding the recommendations with medical condition-based indications and increasing knowledge of mobile applications for physicians. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available